Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
industry leaders
Subscribe to Graphic Arts Monthly
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Color Control: Work in Process

Without proper process control, color management will never work.

By Lisa Leland, Associate Editor -- graphic arts online, 4/1/2001

Color management—that is, printing the color(s) you thought you were going to print—is achieved via process control, or the measurement of production control targets to maintain consistency and predictability throughout the print manufacturing cycle.

"If you don't have process control for the press and in prepress, color management won't work," says Dan Remaley, a specialist with the Process Controls Team at the Graphic Arts Technical Foundation (GATF), Sewickley, Pa. Remaley traverses the country for GATF and the International Prepress Association versing graphic arts professionals on the ins and outs of controlling color variables, from scanning and film output to proofing and press.

Says Remaley, process control is precisely where the problem lies. "The bottom line is that printers don't measure their print attributes; instead, they're using solid ink densities to determine whether they're printing correctly or not."

Follow the dots

Remaley, in addition to working as a press operator, color stripping supervisor, and production and plant manager, spent 14 years at a high-quality trade house producing film and color proofs for printers and advertising agencies. It was there that he established measurable process control and training standards, and served as the sole troubleshooter when color proofs and press sheets didn't match.

He learned that solid ink densities are not what printers ought to be measuring. "The primary telltales," he says, "are dot gain and the gray balance characteristics of the print."

GATF studies confirm that the most significant color balance shifts occur when the dot gain is out of balance or diverges between colors during the press run. Dot gain ideally should be the same for all colors, states Remaley.

Hidden secrets

There are, says Remaley, some readily available ways for printers to improve their process control, and thus their management of color. Of all the tools listed in GATF's 2001 Process Controls Product Catalog, including plate control targets, color bars, and GATF/SWOP proofing bars, Remaley contends that the Proof Comparator is the most valuable. It measures solid density, dot gain, gray balance, hue/gray error, print contrast, and resolution. "But it's a hidden secret," he says. "Nobody uses it."

The other "hidden secret" Remaley exhorts printers to adopt is Gray Component Replacement (GCR), the process of removing multicolor gray, the dirtying component of a color, and replacing it with black. For example, a red that before GCR contained 100% magenta, 80% yellow, and 20% cyan would after GCR comprise 100% magenta, 80% yellow, 10% cyan, and 10% black.

Supplementing with black

"GCR allows printers to put black into areas where three colors print," explains Remaley. "Three colors printing produce a neutral color. With black supplementing, I can reduce the values of those three colors. For example, with GCR I could change a 50% cyan to maybe 30%, and change 40% magenta and 40% yellow to 20% apiece and then add 10% black. I've simply made 30% dots of those 50% dots, which don't change on press as fast. Creating this wider window gives the pressroom more opportunity, yet most people don't even know about GCR."

Recently, QTI unveiled its Color Control System, a closed-loop press control system that was designed through an alliance with Swiss software firm System Brunner. "I think this really is quite a revolutionary product," concludes Remaley. "This is how color should be run but never has been." The system is capable of in-line measurement of gray scale and CMY midtone reproduction as well as color density for web printing. Essentially, the color bar measures three-color gray and opens and closes ink based on three-color gray.

 Sidebar

The Issue of Dot Gain

We print with dots, and that's what we need to measure," GATF's Dan Remaley asserts. "We're just never gotten around to doing it. Even closed-loop inking systems are only changing solid ink densities. It scares me to know that I've been in this industry 30 years and we're still not doing it right. When are we going to learn? When are we going to start?"

Dot gain itself, Remaley points out, is not the primary issue. "The misperception is that dot gain is bad," he says. "Dot gain's not bad; it's the control over it that's bad. For example, if you have 30% gain on your press and I have 20% on mine, theoretically you'd say I print better. But if you've compensated for 30% gain, you'll print just as well as I will. The problem is in the compensation."

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

Sponsored Links



 
Advertisement
Sponsored Links

More Content

  • Blogs

Blogs


Sorry, no blogs are active for this topic.

» VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Advertisements




NEWSLETTERS
Click on a title below to learn more.

e-GAM (Three times a week (MWF))
About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   FREE Subscription   |   Industry Links   |   RSS
© 2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites

ADVERTISEMENT
You will be redirected to your destination in few seconds.